Critical review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Critical review - Essay Example118). What emerges are relationships characterized by homoscoial desire and controller and power and dominance over wo men, gay men, and other straight men (Kiesling 2006, p. 118). Hirammoto (2010) states that Kieslings work is unreserved of the constructs that reproduce the dominance of straightaway male models not only outside of a specific gathering but how they are used to claim power in a same-sex fond group (236). Hirammoto (2010) in addition states that Kieslings work is reflective of the findings in the literature relative to theories about hetero familiar masculinity. Kiesling informs that the way that men display their straight personity is deeply connected to common practices that segregates heterosexuality and other sexual orientations. This assertion finds capital with McEhinny (2004) who argues that theories about relations among heterosexuals typically err when they take position that gender is an attribute and ignore the featu re that it is likewise a practice (150). For McEhinny (2004) Kieslings study lends greater weight to heterosexual studies in that it emphasizes heterosexual practices as evidenced by language and linguistic process patterns. To this end, Kiesling (2006) takes the position that heterosexual practices together with rituals of speech events and communal activities contribute toward establishing homosocial and heterosexual identity (p. 118). Keisling (2006) demonstrates this assertion by reference to the classical alphabet and the concept of Greek sororities and fraternities. As Kiesling (2006) informs The greek letter society system is arranged through an ideology of sexual difference, such(prenominal) that fraternities are all-male, sororities are all-female (p. 118). Even events arranged by the Greek society are predicated on the sexual differences and power differences that emerge as a result. For instance mixers and open parties are designed to distinguish surrounded by males a nd females and emphasize the significance of heterosexual desire and sex and alcohol (Kiesling 2006, p. 119). Kiesling (2006) demonstrates the point by providing an excerpt of a dialogue from a male participant at one of these parties. The excerpt reveals a rather racy regard for heterosexual sexual activities. As Kiesling (2006) reports This high evaluation of heterosexual activity creates a social context in which heterorsexual sex is glorified as an end in itself, thus creating an ideology of heterosexual desire as an important social goal (p. 119). In the dialogue excerpt sexual activities such as hook-up were identified (Kiesling 2006, p. 119). Kielsing (2006) explores these speech activities further by seeking clarification by conducting an interview with other member the male group. During the course of this interview, Kiesling was able to identify a number of heterosexual driven speech activities such as, throwin raps, scamming , a drunk thing and a do your commitment thin g(p. 121). The last dickens speech activities demonstrate how men categorize the difference between their heterosexual desires in terms of blink or long-term sexual triumph. The drunk thing is not only for instant sexual gratification but is also a male bonding affair in which these men express their sexual prowess (Keisling 2006, p. 121). The long-term sexual gratification desires are treated differently among the members of the fraternity. It demonstrates that that the male