Thursday, November 28, 2019
Death Penalty Essays (1764 words) - Penology, Capital Punishment
  Death Penalty  There are four main reasons for punishment: rehabilitation (to return someone to  a former status), reformation (to re-form or re-create an individual),  deterrence (to deter others or to deter the person punished), and retribution  (an eye for an eye). The death penalty is a punishment to a person in which the  person is put to death for a very serious crime they have committed, usually  when they take another person's life. Our state and federal legislators have  created laws that specifically identify which crimes a person commits that can  be punishable by the death penalty. The death penalty is seen as a deterrent to  increasing and more serious crime. If members of the society know that if they  commit serious crimes they could be put to death for it, they are less likely to  commit these crimes. However, there is great disagreement in our society about  whether it is a true deterrent to crime or not. When I think of the thousands of  inhabitants of Death Rows in the prisons in this country...my reaction is:  "What's taking us so long? Let's get that electrical current flowing. Drop  those pebbles now!" Whenever I argue this with friends who have opposite  views, they say that I don't have enough regard for the most marvelous of  miracles - human life. Just the opposite: It's because I have so much regard for  human life that I favor capital punishment. Murder is the most terrible crime  there is. Anything less than the death penalty is an insult to the victim and  society. It says...that we don't value the victim's life enough to punish the  killer fully. Many abolition supporters quote, "the death penalty is not a  deterrent." Many abolitionist also add there is NO deterrent for a murderer  (there will always be a few individuals that are up for a challenge no matter  what the consequences are for their crimes in my opinion). Since jail is neither  a deterrent in essence, according to those that wish to abolish the death  penalty, how long before "jail time" for murderers would be their next  punishment to target for removal from our books. One argument states that the  death penalty does not deter murder. Dismissing capital punishment on that basis  requires us to eliminate all prisons as well because they do not seem to be any  more effective in the deterrence of crime. Others say that states which do have  the death penalty have higher crime rates than those that don't, that a more  severe punishment only inspires more severe crimes. I must point out that every  state in the union is different. These differences include the populations,  number of cities, and yes, the crime rates. Strongly urbanized states are more  likely to have higher crime rates than states that are more rural, such as those  that lack capital punishment. The states that have capital punishment have it  because of their high crime rate, not the other way around. Abolitionists claim  that there are alternatives to the death penalty. They say that life in prison  without parole serves just as well. Certainly, if you ignore all the murders  criminals commit within prison when they kill prison guards and other inmates,  and also when they kill decent citizens upon escape, like Dawud Mu'Min who was  serving a 48-year sentence for the 1973 murder of a cab driver when he escaped a  road work gang and stabbed to death a storekeeper named Gadys Nopwasky in a 1988  robbery that netted $4.00. Fortunately, there is now no chance of Mu'Min  committing murder again. He was executed by the state of Virginia on November    14, 1997. Another flaw is that life imprisonment tends to deteriorate with the  passing of time. Take the Moore case in New York State for example. In 1962,    James Moore raped and strangled 14-year-old Pamela Moss. Her parents decided to  spare Moore the death penalty on the condition that he be sentenced to life in  prison without parole. Later on, thanks to a change in sentencing laws in 1982,    James Moore is eligible for parole every two years! If Pamela's parents knew  that they couldn't trust the state, Moore could have been executed long ago and  they could have put the whole horrible incident behind them forever. Instead  they have a nightmare to deal with biannually. I'll bet not a day goes by that  they don't kick themselves for being foolish enough to trust the liberal sham  that is life imprisonment and rehabilitation. (According to the US Department of    Justice, the average prison sentence    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.